Scree plot.
Confirmatory factor analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis of SWBS and the values between factors are shown in Figure 2. The goodness-of-fit indices of the scale are given in Table 6. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the same study group.

Figures - uploaded by Selami Kardas

Author content

All figure content in this area was uploaded by Selami Kardas

Content may be subject to copyright.

ResearchGate Logo

Discover the world's research

  • 20+ million members
  • 135+ million publications
  • 700k+ research projects

Join for free

Received: August 30, 2016

Revision Received: October 17, 2017

Accepted: November 16, 2017

OnlineFirst: January 30, 2017

Copyright © 2017 EDAM

eISSN: 2458-9675

spiritualpc.net

DOI 10.12738/spc.2017.1.0022 2017 February 2(1) 73–88

Research Article

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

Citation: Ekşi, H., & Kardaş, S. (2017). Spiritual well-being: Scale development and validation. Spiritual Psychology and

Counseling, 2, 73–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/spc.2017.1.0022

Abstract

The spiritual well-being scale was developed as a way of assessing how well adults' lives align with their values and their

understanding of ultimate meaning in personal, social, environmental, and transcendental terms. The items on the scale

were selected based on existing literature and essays addressing spirituality. The scale was then shown to 17 specialists in

spirituality and edited in response to their comments to produce the last version of each item. The scale, composed of 49

items, was then administered to 865 adults (498 women, 57.6%; 367 men, 42.4%). Based on the results, the item set was

then resolved to a 29-item scale, and Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed three significant dimensions of spirituality, which

are transcendence, harmony with nature, and anomie. Construct validity and reliability were empirically ascertained and

the goodness of fit was determined for the proposed model of spiritual well-being. (KMO: 951, when eigenvalue is 2; total

item explanation variance: 58.337 %). The ensemble of the model's coefficients are x²/sd = 4.11, RMESEA = .06, SRMR =

.50, NFI = .90, CFI = .92. The results show that the Spiritual Well-Being Scale has the ability to measure adults' spiritual

well-being in a valid and reliable manner.

Keywords

Spirituality • Spiritual well-being • Scale • Scale development • Reliability • Validity

Halil Ekşi1

Marmara University

Selami Kardaş2

Marmara University

Spiritual Well-Being:

Scale Development and Validation*

* This paper is based on the doctoral thesis of the second author supported by Marmara University BAPKO (numbered as

EGT-C-DRP-130116-0022).

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: halileksi@marmara.edu.tr

2 Correspondence to: Selami Kardaş, Department of Educational Sciences, Marmara University, Goztepe Campus, Kadikoy

34722, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: selamikardas@gmail.com

Spiritüel İyi Oluş: Ölçek Geliştirme ve Geçerliği

Öz

İnsanın değer ve nihai anlamları doğrultusunda kişisel, toplumsal, çevresel ve trasandantal (aşkın) yönleriyle hayatlarını

anlama ve yaşama sürecini belirlemek amacıyla yetişkinlere yönelik geliştirilmiş bir ölçektir. Ölçeğin maddeleri ilgili

literatür ile diğer ölçeklerden yararlanılarak ve konuyla ilgili olan kişilere yazdırılmış kompozisyonlardan elde edilmiştir.

Konuyla ilgili çalışmaları olan 17 uzmanın görüşleri alınmış bunlar dikkate alınarak maddelere son hali verilmiştir. Son

aşamada toplam 49 maddeden oluşan çalışma 865 yetişkine (498 kadın, %57,6; 367 erkek, %42,4) uygulanmıştır. Yapılan

doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda 29 maddelik; aşkınlık, doğayla uyum ve anomi adlı 3 faktörlü bir yapı ortaya çıkmıştır.

Yapılan analizle birlikte ölçeğin yapı geçerliği ve güvenirliği bilimsel olarak ortaya çıkarılmış ve amaçlanan spiritüel iyi oluş

modeline uygun bir yapı ortaya çıkmıştır. (KMO: 951, Eigen değeri 2 olarak alındığında toplam madde açıklama varyansı

% 58,337). Modelin uyum indeksleri (x²/sd = 4.11, RMESEA = .06, SRMR = .50, NFI = .90, CFI = .92) şeklindedir. Spiritüel

İyi Oluş Ölçeği'nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları, ölçeğin yetişkinlerin spiritüel iyi olma hallerini geçerli ve güvenilir

olarak ölçme yeteneğine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Spiritüellik • Spiritüel iyi oluş • Ölçek • Ölçek geliştirme • Geçerlik • Güvenirlik

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

74

Morrison-Orton (2004) stated that, historically, there is no distinction between

religion and spirituality, and that, as a result, the growth of western secularism and

disillusionment with religiosity has led to the perception that science is the only

source of information for the psychological, social and physical diseases of society.

Hill and Pargament (2003) argued that developments in the elds of religiosity and

spirituality have demonstrated that these two concepts have a functional relation

with physical and mental health. Scheck-Varner (2009) asserted that spirituality, in

the widest sense, comprises numerous structures such as religiosity, participation

in religious communities, religious and spiritual practices, religious coping, and

spiritual well-being.

Spirituality and religiosity occupy an important place in human life as motivating

and harmonizing forces. Religion and spirituality are not concepts that enter one's

life only under certain conditions or at certain times; rather, they are ways of life

that challenge us to consistently seek, experience, strengthen, and preserve (Hill &

Pargament, 2003). Patneaude (2006) noted that spirituality is a multidimensional

structure and has been utilized in various contexts such as spirituality, spiritual

goodness and spiritual well-being. She summarizes the denitions of spirituality by

stating that there is a widespread conviction that spirituality is a universal experience,

that it consists of meaning, purpose, values and beliefs, that it has a relational nature

in which oneself, others and a higher being are involved, and that it contains a

transcendental element. According to the results of a study conducted by Zinnbauer

et al. (1997), spirituality and religiosity are concepts with different denitions. While

religiosity is associated with higher-level authoritarianism, religious orthodoxy, inner

religiosity, religious participation of one's parents, self-righteousness, and church

participation, spirituality is associated with mystic experiences, New Age beliefs and

practices, higher income and the experience of frustration with traditional religious

structures.

The status of spiritual health as an important part of general health was

acknowledged ofcially by the World Health Organization in 1998 (Robert, 2003).

Paloutzian and Ellison (1982) had already developed a scale to measure spiritual

well-being that included two subscales: religious and existential well-being. Unruh

(1997) observed that spirituality is dened in the health literature in one of seven

ways: (1) a relationship to God, spiritual well-being or a higher power, and a belief in

a reality greater than the self; (2) an understanding or sensation that spirituality comes

not from within the self but from outside of the self; (3) a state of transcendence or

connectedness that is indispensably related to belief in a higher being or power; (4)

an existential qualication of life that is not from the material world; (5) a sense of

meaning and purpose in life; (6) life power or integrating power of the person; and

(7) the sum of the above.

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

75

According to Chandler, Holden, and Kolander (1992), spirituality is related to the

innate capacity or tendency to seek and move beyond the individual's current location

of centeredness, reaching for a transcendence that involves increased knowledge and

love. Every experience that moves beyond an individual's old reference frame and

results in greater knowledge and love is a spiritual experience. A state of spiritual

wellness consists of the active pursuit of spiritual development or a balanced

openness to spiritual development. By adopting a holistic and theoretical approach

to personality, therapists are able to help and guide the whole person rather than

simply addressing one aspect of the person's life. Furthermore, spiritual wellness

involves psychological wellness and requires the adoption of a transcendental rather

than humanistic view. Spiritual psychotherapy seeks answers from a transcendent

God. Spiritual wellness integrates all dimension of life, including spirituality, with

each other (Baldwin, 2003).

As noted by Moberg and Brusek (1978), spiritual well-being is comprised of two

dimensions, the rst involving the relationship of a person with a higher power within

a certain system of religious beliefs, and the second involving the sense of meaning

and purpose in life. According to this denition, meaning and purpose in life can be

independent from a certain religious structure.

The National Interfaith Coalition on Aging (NICA, 1975) dened spiritual well-

being as the afrmation of wholeness which is blessed and fostered in relationship of

life with God, self, society, and environment. Ellison (1983) stated that researchers

had emphasized the signicance of the need to discover the qualities of well-being.

The above denition by NICA (1975) treats spiritual well-being as a two-dimensional

concept, i.e., religious and psychosocial. Ellison (1983) regards these dimensions

as horizontal and vertical dimensions of spiritual well-being. While the vertical

dimension expresses God or a higher power, the horizontal dimension expresses

purpose in and satisfaction with life.

Opatz (1986) dened spiritual well-being as willingness to seek the meaning and

purpose of human existence, a habit of questioning everything, and the comprehension

of abstract things that cannot be explained or understood easily. A spiritually good

person seeks harmony between the forces inside and outside himself. Paloutzian and

Ellison (1982) drew attention to public (religion) and private (existential harmony)

interpretations of spiritual practices and suggest that spiritual well-being can be better

understood if it is examined through these two dimensions. Kamya (2000) stated

that spiritual well-being is a powerful predictor of self-esteem and ability to cope

effectively with challenges and distresses, and examines spiritual well-being in two

dimensions, demonstrating a positive relationship between belief in a higher being

and feelings of meaning and purpose in life. Chapman (1987) points out that spiritual

well-being is linked to the ability to reach one's full potential, to explore purpose

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

76

in life, to express oneself, and to take action. He also states that spiritual wellness

fosters growth in love, fun, and peace through the pursuit of a satisfactory life and

contribution to others to aid them improve their own spiritual health.

According to Seaward (1991), spiritual well-being incorporated concepts from

many disciplines such as psychology, sociology, philosophy, and theology which

collaboratively create an integrated characteristic network and are expressed as

emotions and behaviors within the spiritual paradigm. Spiritual well-being is a

complicated concept inuenced by a wide range of factors. As Emmons (1999) stated,

spiritual efforts bring about better health and well-being. Perseverance in the pursuit

of transcendental purposes provides a sense of empowerment, stability, support and

direction in critical times. It also acts as a unifying force on the personality even

under social and cultural conditions that would otherwise force the personality to

splinter, and offers not only goals in life but also methods of reaching them.

No previous studies on spiritual well-being have been conducted in Turkey, and

most studies on spirituality have been based on studies developed in other cultures.

It is certain, however, that literature on spirituality cannot be disengaged from the

cultural milieu in which it was produced. Therefore it is essential to be able to

measure spiritual well-being with a scale developed for the culture under study. We

have developed the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) with the aim of measuring

the spiritual well-being of adults in Turkey.

Methods

Study Group

All data used in developing the SWBS was collected from adults. As the scale is

intended to measure the spiritual well-being of adults of all kinds, adulthood was the

only criterion required for participation. The ages of participants ranged from 16 to

54. The scale was administered to 498 females (57.6% of participants) and 367 males

(42.4% of participants). The participants took preliminary versions of the SWBS

through a website called Survey Monkey that collects data via the Internet.

Analysis Method

As the rst step in our Scale Development Study, we reviewed the literature

about spiritual well-being and analyzed other scales developed previously to

assess spiritual well-being or similar qualities. We then asked 57 adults interested

in spiritual well-being to write compositions about the subject including clear and

instructive denitions of it. Working within the framework of the data thus collected,

we generated 170 items. We attempted to include sensual, cognitive, and behavioral

items as Katz and Stotland (1959) recommended. Next, they were evaluated by three

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

77

experts in the eld and the number of items was decreased to 74 through the removal

of some items and the addition of others in response to their suggestions. The resulting

74-item draft of our scale was then shown to 15 other experts. In this process, each

expert response was coded as one of three Likert types (1 = Item is suitable, 2 = Item

should be revised, 3 = Item should be removed) on a questionnaire form that we

provided to them. Experts were invited to make corrections if necessary, and blanks

were left opposite the items for this purpose. Subsequently, the number of items was

decreased to 51 through the removal of some items according to content validity rate

as proposed by Veneziano and Hooper (1997). In addition, 18 items were edited again

according to the experts' suggestions. Finally, in response to the feedback received

in a pilot study, two more items were removed from the draft so that the draft nally

consisted of 49 items. Answers to the items are to be given in a ve-point rating scale

(1 = Not applicable to me at all, 2 = Not applicable to me, 3 = Somewhat applicable

to me, 4 = Quite applicable to me, 5 = Completely applicable to me).

After the pilot study, the instructions accompanying the scale were also edited.

The scale in its nal form was then administered to actual subjects: 897 adults in

total. When all results were examined, 32 response forms were found to have been

lled out incorrectly or were incomplete and were accordingly removed from the

evaluation. Thus useable data were acquired from 865 subjects in total and scale

development analyses were begun.

Statistical Analysis

Two statistics programs were used for data analysis. Exploratory factor analysis

was performed on the data in order to assess the SWBS's validity. The suitability

of the data for factor analysis was examined by means of the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin

(KMO) parameter and the Bartlett sphericity test. In exploratory factor analysis,

the Principal Component Technique (Kleinbaum, Kupper & Muller, 1987; Zeller

& Karmines, 1978) was used. After exploratory factor analysis, conrmatory factor

analysis was performed on the same data set to analyze the relations between factors.

In order to assess the scale's reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefcient was calculated.

Findings

Reliability Analyses

Reliability that indicates the consistency of a range of measurements according

to Cronbach (1990), is related to how correctly a test or measurement tool measures

as well as to the consistency of the results obtained in different measurements

(Thompson, 2003). There are certain statistical methods for measuring the reliability

of Likert–type scales and for assessing the internal consistency of scales and their

subdimensions (Tavakol & Dennick, 2011).

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

78

Validity Analyses

Item analyses are conducted to determine whether the items of a measurement

scale result in generating meaningful data, both together and within sub dimensions

of the scale. As part of our scale's validity study, we performed factor analysis, a

structural validity study that is used to determine how accurately the structure of the

target characteristic is measured using this scale that aims to determine the scale's

structure with regard to this feature (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007). Factor analysis

has been used frequently in the elds of education, psychology, and health sciences

in recent years. One of its benets is that when complex statistical procedures are

incorporated, the process enables us to compare similar data across many studies and

experiments (Williams, Onsman, & Brown, 2010).

Two types of factor analyses exist. The rst is the examination type, in which

the researcher seeks information about the nature of the factors measured with the

measurement tool rather than simply testing a certain hypothesis while remaining

uninformed about the number of factors that the measurement tool measures.

Exploratory factor analysis is another name for this type. The second type, which

is used in experiments testing a hypothesis developed by a researcher in accordance

with a theory, is conrmatory factor analysis (DeCoster, 1998). Both types of factor

analyses were used in this scale's development. For validity procedures, factor

analysis was performed rst to determine groupings (factor) between items. Later on,

KMO and Bartlett's Test Values were determined, analysis of basic components was

conducted and, nally, varimax rotation procedures were carried out.

The suitability of our data for factor analysis was analyzed by means of the Kaiser-

Mayer-Olkin (KMO) coefcient and Bartlett's Sphericity test. The KMO coefcient

indicates whether a data matrix is suitable for factor analysis and whether the data

structure is suitable for factor extraction. For factorability, KMO should be higher

than 0.60. Bartlett's test examines whether there is a relation between variables within

the context of partial correlations. We also evaluated whether our research data were

suitable for factor analysis by examining the KMO and Barlett's Test results and

analyzing them as shown in Table 1 below in sequence.

Table 1

KMO vs Bartlett's Test Value

.950

Chi Square Value 15443.420

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Degree of freedom 406

P .000

The KMO test is important for testing both whether the range is sufcient and

whether partial correlations are small or large. A good KMO score is close to 1 and

an unacceptable score is lower than .50. In the present study, the KMO value for the

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

79

SWBS was found to be excellent (.95). The Barlett's test result was 15443.420 ( <

.00), indicating that the values are meaningful and that the data used has a multivariate

normal distribution.

The rst factor analysis was performed on our 49 items. In the rst analysis, when

there is no rotation and the eigenvalue is set to 1, an eight-factor structure occurs.

The eight factors that emerge explain 59.26% of the total variance. Our analyzes

show that the factors with eigenvalues of 2 and over explain 47.15% of the total

variance. In the social sciences, explanation of between 40 and 60% of variance

is considered adequate. Thus the eigenvalue for our analyzes was set to 2, and the

remaining analyzes were continued in this way. When the eigenvalue was set to 2, a

three–factor structure emerged.

After this procedure, the analysis was continued using the Varimax rotation

technique to determine whether the factors were independent of one another. This

revealed that some items did not have the desired load values while others received

a common load from multiple factors. Items scoring below ( < .60) were thus

eliminated. The analysis was continuously repeated as items 8, 41, 10, 29, 31, 2, 7,

49, 35, 29, 15, 19, 1, 42, 22, 46, 36, 16, 37, and 6 were removed from the scale one by

one; thus the scale took on its nal form. The resulting 29-item scale assesses three

sub dimensions of spiritual well-being in its nal form. When the items in each sub

dimension are examined, the sub dimensions correlate reasonably.

Component Number

2928272625242322212019181716151413121110 987654321

Eigenvalue

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Figure 1. Scree plot.

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

80

As shown in Figure 1, the point where the graphical curve shows a rapid decline is

after the third factor. Subsequently, the curve moves in the same direction. Given this,

it is thought that the number of factors examined by the scale should be no more than

three. Eigenvalues and cumulative variance percentages for the three factors found

are shown in Table 2.

As can be seen from Figure 1 and Table 2, three factors emerge when the eigenvalue

is set at 2 and continuous analysis is applied. The total variance of these three factors

is 58.79%. The rst factor was observed to explain 31.38% of variance, the second

factor to explain 14.17%, and the third factor to explain 13.23%.

Table 2

Total Variance

Factors

Initial Eigenvalue Totals Total Factor Loads Rotated Totals of Factor Loads

Total Variance

%

Cumulative

%Total Variance

%

Cumulative

%Total Variance

%

Cumulative

%

1 10.425 35.947 35.947 10.425 35.947 35.947 9.101 31.383 31.383

2 3.723 12.837 48.785 3.723 12.837 48.785 4.110 14.173 45.556

3 2.901 10.004 58.789 2.901 10.004 58.789 3.838 13.233 58.789

4 .936 3.226 62.015

5 .845 2.913 64.928

6 .791 2.728 67.657

7 .707 2.438 70.094

8 .650 2.240 72.334

9 .631 2.176 74.510

10 .588 2.027 76.537

11 .555 1.914 78.451

12 .515 1.777 80.228

13 .492 1.695 81.923

14 .464 1.600 83.524

15 .460 1.586 85.110

16 .452 1.559 86.669

17 .436 1.503 88.172

18 .397 1.370 89.542

19 .373 1.285 90.827

20 .350 1.205 92.033

The nal states of item status and loads are presented in Table 3:

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

81

Table 3

SWBS's Item-Factor Structure

Items

Factors

Transcendence Harmony with Nature Anomie

Item 27 .881

Item 48 .873

Item 44 .862

Item 11 .852

Item 45 .824

Item 21 .818

Item 47 .797

Item 39 .758

Item 3 .727

Item 14 .695

Item 5 .693

Item 25 .693

Item 10 .669

Item 33 .644

Item 13 .638

Item 26 .785

Item 20 .761

Item 12 .736

Item 43 .725

Item 4 .702

Item 38 .699

Item 32 .643

Item 23 .819

Item 30 .778

Item 9 .744

Item 24 .705

Item 34 .701

Item 28 .665

Item 17 .643

When the eigenvalue is set to 2 and processed, it is seen that the scale consists of

three factors and that the items in each factor have high values (the lowest item load

value was .638 and the highest item load value was .881). There are no high-value

common loads affecting all three of the factors.

As a next step, reliability analysis of each sub-factor is performed. The Cronbach

Alpha values calculated on the basis of each factor are given in Table 4:

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

82

Table 4

Cronbach's Alpha Value

Factors Cronbach's Alpha Value

1 (Transcendence) .953

2 (Harmony with Nature) .864

3 (Anomie) .853

Total .886

As shown in Table 4, our statistical analysis of the reliability of the scale found

that the the total reliability coefcients were sufciently high to be acceptable in

the social sciences. As for the reliability coefcients of the sub-dimensions, the

Cronbach's Alpha value of the transcendence sub-factor is α = .953, while that of the

harmony with nature sub-factor is .864 and that of the anomie sub-factor is .853. The

total Cronbach's Alpha value was calculated as α = .886. These results suggest that

the scale has high values at the point of internal consistency.

Table 5

Correlative Relations Between Sub-Factors

Factors Transcendence Harmony with Nature Anomie

Total .885** .585** .230**

Transcendence 1 .425** -.162**

Harmony with Nature 1 -.159**

Anomie 1

**p < .001

As shown in Table 5, the sub-factors have a meaningful relationship with each

other and with the total score in the positive direction as Pearson Correlation Analyses

were conducted to determine whether there was a signicant relationship between the

factors determined on the scale. The correlation of the Transcendence sub-factor to

the total score is (r = .885; p < .001), the correlation of the Harmony with Nature

sub-factor to the total score is (r = .585; p < .001) and the correlation of the Anomie

sub-factor to the total score is (r = .230; p < .001). This indicates that the sub-factors

are strongly correlated to the scale. These results are important to show that all factors

are within the same structure.

Criterion Validity

In order to determine the criterion validity for the SWBS, we tested it against the

Spiritual Orientation Scale developed by Kasapoğlu (2015) for the Transcendence

sub-factor, against the Self-denial sub-factor of the Nature Loyalty Scale adapted

to Turkish by Çakır, Karaarslan, Şahin, and Ertepınar (2015) for the Harmony with

Nature sub-factor and against the Social Wellness Scale adapted to Turkish by Akın,

Demirci, Çitemel, Sarıçam, and Ocakçı (2013) for the Anomie sub-factor. Each

sub-factor of the SWBS and the corresponding other scale or sub dimension were

administered to 72 students. Pearson Correlation Analysis was performed to test the

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

83

criterion validity by determining correlative relationships between scales or sub-

factors.

There is a signicant positive relationship between the Transcendence Sub-factor

of the SWBS and the Spiritual Orientation Scale (r = .94; p < .001), between the

Harmony with Nature Sub-factor of the SWBS and the Self-denial sub-factor of the

Nature Loyalty Scale (r = .74; p < .001) and between the Anomie Sub-factor of the

SWBS and the Social Wellness Scale (r = .34; p < .003). Thus statistically signicant

correlations were found between all subscales of the SWBS and other measurement

instruments assessing the same values according to our criterion validity analysis,

and the criterion validity of the SWBS is conrmed.

Conrmatory Factor Analysis

Figure 2. Conrmatory factor analysis.

The conrmatory factor analysis of SWBS and the values between factors are

shown in Figure 2. The goodness-of-t indices of the scale are given in Table 6.

Conrmatory factor analysis was performed on the same study group.

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

84

Table 6

Fit Indices

Scale x²/sd RMSA S-RMR NFI CFI

4.11 .060 .050 .90 .92

Note: RMSEA: Root-Mean-Square Error Approximation; S-RMR: Standardized

Root Mean Square Residual; NFI: Normed Fit Index; CFI: Comparative Fit Index

Fit indices dene how compatible the analysis is with the trial data (McDonald

& Ho, 2002). Our analysis showed that the data were in compliance with the model.

Conclusion and Discussion

Descriptive factor analysis revealed the existence of three factors in the context of

continuous analysis with an eigenvalue of 2. The total variance explained by these

three factors is 58.79%. The scale items related to each factor were examined and the

sub-factors were named. The rst factor was called the "Transcendence" sub-factor,

the second was called the "Harmony with Nature" sub-factor and the third was called

the "Anomie" sub-factor.

Conrmatory factor analysis was performed in the last step, but rst, the ratio of

the chi-square value to the degree of freedom was checked. The chi-square value is

the traditional measure used to assess a model's overall t; it evaluates the magnitude

of the discrepancy between data and covariance matrices (Hu & Bentler, 1999).

There are certain limitations of the chi-square value when it is used as a t index

in analysis. The most important of these is its sensitivity to sample size. Chi-square

value is sensitive to sample size because it is essentially a statistical signicance

test, and it almost always rejects the model when large samples are used (Bentler &

Bonnet, 1980; Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1993). Given this, in this study which has a large

sample size (865 individuals), it is acceptable that the ratio of chi-square to degrees

of freedom is somewhat high (χ 2 /sd = 4.11) relative to the range of acceptable

values (2–5) (Tabachnick & Fidel, 2007). For this reason, other adjustment indices

should be taken into consideration. The next index, RMSA (Root Mean-Square Error

Approximation), indicates how well the unknown but optimally chosen coefcient

estimates t the model's data covariance matrix (Byrne, 1998). Though there are

various opinions on the value of RMSA, a score between .08 and .10 is generally

believed to indicate a moderate t and a score below .08 to indicate a good t

(MacCallum, Browne, & Sugawara, 1996). In our working model, as seen in Table

6, the RMSA value is .060 and corresponds to a good t. In another index, SRMR

(Standardized Root Mean Square Residual), a score below .08 corresponds to a good

t and a score below .10 corresponds to a moderate t (Brown, 2006; Hu & Bentler,

1999). For the NFI (Normed Fit Index), Bentler and Bonnet (1980) and Byrne (1994)

hd stated that a score of .90 or above corresponds to a good t; the .90 NFI value

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

85

in our model thus indicates a good t. The next index, the CFI (Comparative Fit

Index), is included in all Structural Equation Model programs and is one of the most

commonly used t indices since it is one of the measures least affected by sample size

(Fan, Thompson, & Wang, 1999). CFI values exceeding .95 indicate a perfect t (Hu

& Bentler, 1999), while values over .85 indicate an acceptable t (Bollen, 1989). The

CFI value in the working model (.92) indicates a good t.

As a result of this validity and reliability analysis, the SWBS is shown to measure

the spiritual well-being of adults in a reliable and valid manner. It should be noted

that this scale has not been tested for validity and reliability in children.

References

Akın, A., Demirci, İ., Çitemel, N., Sarıçam, H., & Ocakçı, H. (2013, May). Sosyal İyi Olma Ölçeği

Trkçe Formu'nun geçerlik ve gvenirliği. Paper presented at the 5. Ulusal Lisansst Eğitim

Sempozyumu, Sakarya, Trkiye.

Baldwin, D. C. (2003). Spiritual identity: Evaluating a seminar on spiritual identity on spiritual

wellness. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Christian University, Oklahoma).

Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Signicance tests and goodness of t in the analysis of

covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Conrmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford

Publications, Inc.

Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage Publications.

Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic

concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Çakır, B., Karaarslan, G., Şahin, E., & Ertepınar, H. (2015). Doğaya Bağlılık Ölçeğinin Trkçe'ye

adaptasyonu. İlköğretim Online, 14(4), 1370–1383.

Chandler, C. K., Holden, J. M., & Kolander, C. A. (1992). Counseling for spiritual wellness: Theory

and practice. Journal of Counselling & Development, 71, 168–175.

Chapman, L. S. (1987). Developing a useful perspective on spiritual health: Love, joy, peace, and

fulllment. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1, 12–17.

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychometric testing (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of factor analysis. Retrieved from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html

Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of

Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.

Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in

personality. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model

specication on structural equation modeling t indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1),

56–83.

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

86

Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of

religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. American

Psychologist, 58(1), 64–74.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for t indexes in covariance structure analysis:

Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS

Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientic Software International Inc.

Kamya, H. A. (2000). Hardiness and spiritual well-being among social work students: Implications

for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 231–240.

Kasapoğlu, F. (2015). Manevi Yönelim Ölçeği'nin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve gvenirlik. İnön

Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakltesi Dergisi, 16(3), 51–68.

Katz, D., & Stotland, E. (1959). A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change.

Psychology: A study of a science, 3 , 423–475.

Klainbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1987). Applied Regression Analysis and Other

Multivariable Methods. Boston. MA: PWS-Kent Publishing.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination

of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–49.

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting statistical equation

analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.

Moberg, D. O., & Brusek, P. M. (1978). Spiritual well-being: A neglected subject in quality of life

research. Social Indicators Research, 5, 303–323.

Morrison-Orton, D. J. (2004). How rehabilitation professionals dene the concepts of spirituality

and religion when working with individuals with disabilities. Journal of Social Work in Disability

& Rehabilitation, 3(2), 37–55.

National Interfaith Coalition on Aging (NICA). (1975). Spiritual well-being: A denition. Athens,

GA: NICA.

Opatz, J. P. (1986). Stevens Point: A longstanding program for students at a Midwestern University.

American Journal of Health Promotion, 1(1), 60–67.

Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. (1982). Spiritual well-being scale. Measures of religiosity, 382–385.

Patneaude, A. B. (2006). Spiritual wellness among undergraduate college students. (Unpublished

doctoral dissertation, Colarado State University, Colarado).

Robert, T. (2003). The relationship between spiritual well-being and job satisfaction among adult

workers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Missisipi State University, Mississipi).

Scheck-Varner, J. E. (2009). Effects of spiritual well-being, religious coping, and hardiness on

parenting behaviors in low socioeconomic status families. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation,

The University of Sothern Mississippi, Mississipi).

Seaward, B. L. (1991). Spiritual wellbeing: A health education model. Journal of Health Education,

22(3), 166–169.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson/

Allyn.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of

Medical Education, 2 , 53–55.

Ekşi, Kardaş / Spiritual Well-Being: Scale Development and Validation

87

Thompson, B. (2003). Guidelines for authors reporting score reliability estimates. B. Thompson

(Ed.) Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues (pp. 91–101). Newbury Park,

CA: SAGE.

Unruh, A. M. (1997). Reections on Spirituality and occupation: Garden musings and the Himalayan

Blue Poppy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 156–160.

Veneziano, L., & Hooper, J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related

questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67–70.

Williams, B., Onsman, A., & Brown, T. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A ve-step guide for

novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 8(3), 1–13.

Zeller, R. A., & Carmines, E. G. (1978). Statistical Analysis of Social Data. Chicago, IL: Rand

McNally College Publishing Company.

Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G., … Kadar,

T. L. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientic Study of

Religion, 36(4), 549–564.

SPIRITUAL PSYCHOLOGY AND COUNSELING

88

Appendix

Spiritual Well-Being Scale

Ltfen aşağıdaki ifadeleri okuduktan sonra kendinizi değerlendirip sizin için

en uygun seçeneğin numarasını işaretleyiniz. Numaraların anlamları:

(1) Bana Hiç Uygun Değil

(2) Bana Uygun Değil

(3) Bana Biraz Uygun

(4) Bana Oldukça Uygun

(5) Bana Tamamen Uygun

Ltfen her ifadeye mutlaka TEK yanıt veriniz ve kesinlikle BOŞ

bırakmayınız. En uygun yanıtları vereceğinizi mit eder katkılarınız için

teşekkr ederiz.

Bana hiç uygun değil

Bana uygun değil

Bana biraz uygun

Bana oldukça uygun

Bana tamamen uygun

1. İlahi bir gce bağlı olmak bana gven verir. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

2. Doğaya saygı duyulması gerektiğini dşnrm. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

3. Hayata dair bir hoşnutsuzluk duygusu hissederim. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

4. Bir problemle karşılaştığımda Allah'ın yardımını hissederim. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

5. Allah'ın gizli ve açık tm duygu ve dşncelerimi bildiğine inanırım. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

6. Btn canlıların saygıyı hak ettiğini dşnrm. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

7. Hayatımda byk bir boşluk var. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

8. Gnlk hayatta Allah'ın kudretine şahit olurum. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

9. Allah'ın beni sevdiğine ve önemsediğine inanırım. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

10. Yeryzndeki tm canlılara iyi davranırım. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

11. Hayattan zevk almam. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

12. Hayatımın her anında Allah'ın varlığını hissederim. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

13. Daha gçl bir varlığa sığınma duygusu beni rahatlatır. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

14. Kendimi doğanın bir parçası olarak görrm. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

15. Hayatımın amacını halen bulabilmiş değilim. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

16. Yaşadığım her olayda bir hayır olduğuna inanırım. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

17. İnancım, nasıl bir hayat sreceğime dair bana yol gösterir. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

18. Yeryzndeki btn canlıların hakları benim için önemlidir. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

19. Sorunlarımı çözmeye nereden başlayacağımı bilemem. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

20. Yalnız kaldığımda Allah'ı ve yarattıklarını dşnrm (tefekkr ederim). (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

21. İnanç ve değerlerim, zorluklar karşısında dayanabilme gcm arttırır. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

22. Doğayla uyum içinde yaşarım. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

23. Zorluklar yaşadığımda bunalmış hissederim. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

24. İnancım, yaşadığım sıkıntılarda dahi olumlu taraarın olabileceğini

görmemi sağlar. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

25. Hayatta hiçbir şey sebepsiz değildir. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

26. Hayatın beni mutsuz eden olaylardan ibaret olduğunu dşnrm. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

27. Her şeyin elimde olmadığını bilmek zldğm olaylar karşısında bir teselli

kaynağıdır. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

28. Yeryzndeki her doğal varlığın eşsiz olduğuna inanırım. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

29. Dnya hayatının geçici olduğuna inanmak beni hırslarımdan arındırır. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

... The Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale was developed and introduced to the literature by Ekşi and Kardaş [17], and it aims to assess how well adults' lives are compatible with their values and understanding of the ultimate meaning in terms of personal, environmental, and social aspects. During the development process of the scale, 17 experts were consulted, and the scale was given its final form. ...

... The scale is in the form of a 5-point Likert-type scale. The scale is scored ranging from 1= "Not applicable to me at all" to 5= "Completely applicable to me." Items "1, 4,5,8,9,12,13,16,17,20,21,24,25,27 and 29" of the scale constitute the transcendency dimension, items "2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and 28" form the dimension of harmony with nature, and items "3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23 and 26" make up the dimension of anomie. While scoring the scale, the anomie dimension is inversely scored. ...

... As a result of analyses, the construct validity and reliability of the scale were empirically determined, and a scale with the goodness of fit for the spiritual well-being model was produced (KMO:951, when eigenvalue is taken as 2, the item explanation of total variance is 58.337%). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.86, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the subscales of transcendency (i), harmony with nature (ii), and anomie (iii) were determined as 0.95 (i), 0.86 (ii) and 0.85 (iii) [17]. In our study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was identified as 0.93, and for the subscales, they were 0.91 (i), 0.82 (ii), and 0.89 (iii). ...

... It has three sub-scales. Items 1,3,5,6,9,10,13,18,25,27 assess the severe pain fear, items 2,4,7,12,19,22,23,24,28,30 assess the minor pain fear and items 8,11,14,15,16,17,20,21,26,29 assess the medical pain fear. The higher scale score indicates the higher fear. ...

... For the analysis of sampling adequacy, the KMO index for 150 samples was found as 0.88 to be close to perfect for factor analysis. In the literature, it was reported to be >0.50 (26)(27)(28)(29). Also for the suitability of the data set the Barlett's test of sphericity showed the sample was coming from a multivariate normal scatter and was found significant with values of (χ2=807.616, ...

... It is also important to test the range sufficiency and partial correlations whether they are small or large. These parameters showed the sampling was appropriate to conduct factor analysis (25,26,29). ...

  • Seher Ünver Seher Ünver
  • Fatma Nesrin Turan

Aim:There is a need to assess the pain fear levels of surgical patients simply and appropriately before the surgery. This study aimed to develop and test the psychometrics of an instrument to evaluate the fear of postoperative pain.Methods:This methodological study was conducted at four surgical clinics including general surgery, orthopedics and traumatology, neurosurgery, heart and vessel surgery of a university hospital between 28 March and 19 October 2018. Totally, 150 patients who were scheduled for elective surgery and at their preoperative day were included. This scale contained 10 items related to the postoperative pain sources and aimed to identify the pain fear of patients preoperatively. To measure the sampling adequacy, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index and Bartlett's test of sphericity was used. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the construct validity. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha calculation. All hypotheses were tested in two directions.Results:The total variance explained 55.5% of the variance for one factor structure consisting of 10 items. The model fit index values through the confirmatory factor analysis were found to support this structure.Conclusion:The scale is appropriate to be used in clinical settings to quickly evaluate the elective surgical patients' fear level of postoperative pain preoperatively.

... A person's spiritual health guides their spiritual feelings in decisions and is an important factor in terms of establishing a balance between one's beliefs and values and their relationships with themselves and their environment (Hall, 2013). Spiritual health has been shown to correspond to a high level of spiritual well-being (Carey et al., 2011;Ekşi and Kardaş, 2017;Phenwan et al., 2019), which suggests that the relationship between spiritual health and physical health affects the self-esteem of individuals and enables individuals to have a positive outlook on life through the positive relationships they are able to establish with those around them (Chirico, 2016;Phenwan et al., 2019). Therefore, individuals who are spiritually healthy are able to establish a strong positive connection with other people and their environment, derive meaning from their lives through their devotion to a divine power and have self-awareness about any negative feelings and thoughts they have about life experiences (Chirico, 2016;Ekşi and Kardaş, 2017). ...

... Spiritual health has been shown to correspond to a high level of spiritual well-being (Carey et al., 2011;Ekşi and Kardaş, 2017;Phenwan et al., 2019), which suggests that the relationship between spiritual health and physical health affects the self-esteem of individuals and enables individuals to have a positive outlook on life through the positive relationships they are able to establish with those around them (Chirico, 2016;Phenwan et al., 2019). Therefore, individuals who are spiritually healthy are able to establish a strong positive connection with other people and their environment, derive meaning from their lives through their devotion to a divine power and have self-awareness about any negative feelings and thoughts they have about life experiences (Chirico, 2016;Ekşi and Kardaş, 2017). Studies conducted with different groups, such as palliative care patients, patients scheduled to undergo open heart surgery, and cancer patients, have found that individuals with high spiritual wellbeing have high levels of coping skills (Nakagawa et al., 2018;Sun et al., 2016;Paiva et al., 2015;Phenwan et al., 2019). ...

... This scale, developed by Ekşi and Kardaş, (2017), is a 5-point Likert-type, with response options ranging from 1 = Does not suit me at all to 5 = Completely suitable for me. The scale includes three sub-dimensions, "Transcendence", "Harmony with nature" and "Anomie". ...

The aim of the study is to determine how Islamic belief and spiritual well-being affect the attitudes of individuals towards organ donation. The study was designed as a descriptive-relational study and included the participation of 402 adults in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. For data collection, a personal information form, the Organ Donation Attitude Scale, and the Spiritual Well-being Scale were used. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the acceptance of organ donation according to Islamic beliefs and organ donation attitude. A negative relationship was found between organ donation attitude and the scores on the anomie sub-dimension of the Spiritual Well-being Scale, while a positive relationship was found between organ donation attitude and the scores on the transcendence and harmony with nature sub-dimensions. It was concluded from the results that Islamic belief and spiritual well-being have an effect on the organ donation attitudes of individuals.

... The scale is a 5-point Likert-type self-assessment scale that was developed by Ekşi and Kardaş (2017) to measure spiritual well-being. The scale consists of 29 items. ...

... The scores of the items in the sub-factors are obtained by the sum of points of the answers given to the items of that sub-factor; the total spiritual well-being score is obtained by the sum of the sub-factor scores, and it ranges between 29 and 145 points. Higher scores indicate higher general spiritual well-being (Ekşi & Kardaş, 2017). The original Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale is 0.82. ...

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between pregnant women's fear of coronavirus (COVID-19), depression, and spiritual well-being. This cross-sectional research was carried out with 336 pregnant women living in a city in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey between the 1st of March and 30th of March 2021. For data collection, the scales of the Fear of COVID-19, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Spiritual Well-being were administered to the participants. The pregnant women's fear of COVID-19 was found to be at a moderate level, their depression was at a mild level, and their spiritual well-being was above the moderate level. It was found that there was a significant negative correlation between the spiritual well-being levels of pregnant women and their fear of COVID-19 and depression. Moreover, it was also found that there was a significant positive correlation between pregnant women's levels of fear of COVID-19 and depression (p < 0.001). It is recommended that relevant spiritual care practices can be disseminated and implemented effectively to reduce pregnant women's fear and depression during the pandemic. In addition, when providing care to pregnant women, health professionals can adopt a holistic approach to increase pregnant women's spiritual well-being.

... Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS). This scale was developed by Eksi and Kardas [40] in order to understand how people live and understand life in personal, social, environmental, and faith terms. In the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was determined as 0.88. ...

Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected the caregivers of people with all chronic diseases, including people with cancer (PWC). This study was conducted to determine the impact of anxiety and spiritual well-being on the care burden of caregivers of PWC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design This cross-sectional descriptive study included 250 caregivers of hematology and oncology patients registered with a cancer support association. All participants completed the following self-report questionnaires: the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI). Results Most (82.4%) of the caregivers expressed fear that their patient may contract COVID-19, and 42.0% stated that they had difficulty getting to the hospital. The caregivers' mean ZBI score was 21.06 ± 14.64, their mean GAD-7 score was 14.51 ± 6.02, and their mean SWBS score was 111.50 ± 16.84. According to the results of regression analysis, SWBS and GAD-7 scores had a significant effect on the ZBI score (p < 0.05). Conclusion In this study, anxiety explained most of the care burden during COVID-19. Therefore, during the COVID-19 pandemic, it may be beneficial to implement practices to promote spirituality and reduce anxiety in caregivers of PWC.

... The score range is 0-20. The feeling of falling in personal accomplishment consists of 8 items (4,7,9,12,17,18,19,21) that define the feelings of competence and success in people working with people, it contains positive expressions and is reverse-coded, so the higher scores to be obtained show a decrease in personal accomplishment. The scale consists of 22 items and is a five-point Likert-type scale (scoring from 0 to 4). ...

This study was conducted as a descriptive study to determine the relationship between quality of work life, burnout and spiritual well-being in intensive care nurses. The research has been carried out on 211 nurses who work in the intensive care units in three public hospitals located in Turkey's Eastern Anatolia Region. In data collection, a form containing questions about the socio-demographic characteristics of individuals (age, gender, education level, marital status, economic status and receiving spiritual care education), "Spiritual Well-being Scale", "Nursing Work Life Scale" and "Maslach Burnout Scale" were used. T test was used for independent variables in the analysis of the data. In addition, the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable in numerical data was made using multiple regression analysis. In this study, it was determined that the spiritual well-being and emotional exhaustion levels of the nurses were above the middle level, and the mean scores of the nurses' quality of life, depersonalization and personal accomplishment were below the middle level. As a result, it was found that as the spiritual well-being levels of nurses working in intensive care increased, their burnout levels decreased and their work life quality increased. In addition, it was found that nurses who received spiritual care training had higher work life quality and lower burnout levels than nurses who did not receive training.

  • Tuğba Aydın Yıldırım
  • Duygu Kes Duygu Kes

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between coping with pain in individuals with chronic pain and their levels of spiritual wellbeing. The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study. It was conducted with 148 participants who were experiencing chronic pain. Data were collected using Sociodemographic Questionnaire, Pain Coping Questionnaire (PCQ) and Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS). Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk's test, skewness, kurtosis, Cronbach's α, mean, standard deviation, mean rank and binary logistic regression analysis. According to the data obtained, it was concluded that participants' levels of spiritual wellbeing were high, and spiritual wellbeing could be used as an effective mechanism for coping with pain. It is therefore recommended that training sessions and information meetings be organized to create awareness in health care and social work professionals and in those living with chronic pain and their families.

  • Yüksel CAN ÖZ
  • Songül Duran Songül Duran

Spiritual well-being is among the factors that affect subjective recovery. This study aimed to explore the relationship between subjective recovery and spiritual well-being among psychiatric patients and to identify the factors that affected their subjective recovery. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted with 96 patients admitted to the psychiatry clinic of a hospital. It was found that the patients had high subjective recovery assessment levels and medium levels of spiritual well-being. There was a positive association between the patients' subjective recovery assessments and their spiritual well-being, and spiritual well-being was a significant predictor of the subjective recovery level. It is recommended that mental health professionals focus on serving patients through a holistic healthcare approach and enhancing patients' subjective recovery levels through applications that will strengthen the spiritual dimension.

  • Brian Luke Seaward

The following article presents a theoretical model based upon a synthesis of psychological theories regarding components of the human spirit, development of spiritual wellbeing and the manifestation of self-reliance. These components include an insightful relationship with both oneself and others, a strong personal value system, and a meaningful purpose in one's life. Based on this model, health education programs can incorporate exercises to remove existing roadblocks into existing classes or newly designed courses to promote development of these components of human spirit as part of the wellness paradigm.

  • Anita M. Unruh

Spirituality is a key dimension in occupational therapy models of practice, but definitions of spirituality and its relationship to occupation have eluded us. Nevertheless, if the writings of people who are deeply involved in their occupations are examined, we discover that spirituality can be expressed through our engagement in occupations with personal meaning in our lives. In these reflections, the author examines spirituality as it is expressed by gardeners in their garden musings, and suggests that this occupation has the capacity to enrich spirituality in everyday life. Further study of the relationship between specific occupations and spirituality may illuminate the construct of spirituality and demonstrate the ways in which occupation can be used to facilitate a richer spiritual life for individuals and communities.